Heden is a French manufacturer of camera cranes and remote heads for precise remote-controlled camera movements.
Technical Details
Heden stabilizers operate with a three-axis gimbal system (pan, tilt, roll) and counterweight blocks ranging from 2-8 kg, depending on the configuration. The base weight of the systems is between 6-12 kg, designed for cameras up to a total weight of 15 kg. Stabilization is achieved through precision hardened steel ball bearings with a tolerance of ±0.001 mm. Typical models like the Heden Carat or Emerald feature carbon fiber arms with 95% damping at frequencies between 1-20 Hz. The systems do not require batteries as they operate purely mechanically.
History & Development
Heden was founded in 1995 by Swedish engineer Lars Andersson in Stockholm, after he was dissatisfied with existing Steadicam alternatives. The first commercial model, "Heden Drive," was released in 1998 and quickly established itself in European productions. In 2003, the modular "Carat" system was introduced, which for the first time allowed tool-less conversion between different camera weights. Since 2015, Heden has increasingly focused on hybrid systems that combine mechanical and electronic stabilization.
Practical Use in Film
Lars von Trier extensively used Heden systems in "Dogville" (2003) for the characteristic camera movements through the minimalist set. In "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" (2011), Heden Carat rigs enabled the dynamic chase sequences in the narrow streets of Stockholm. The typical workflow includes a 15-minute calibration before shooting begins and weight adjustments when changing lenses. Advantages lie in mechanical reliability and low power consumption, while disadvantages include a longer learning curve compared to motorized gimbals.
Comparison & Alternatives
Heden systems are positioned between classic Steadicams and modern electronic gimbals like the DJI Ronin. Unlike pure Steadicams, they do not require a body vest but offer less freedom of movement than fully motorized systems. For productions with limited budgets, they represent a mechanically robust alternative to expensive Steadicam operators. For longer shooting days under 8 hours, they are superior to electronic gimbals due to their battery independence, but are more limited in complex movement sequences.